Healing Spirits: The Intersection of Chaplaincy and Ethics

Chaplaincy and spiritual care are essential components of healthcare, addressing the physical, spiritual, mental, and social aspects of a person’s life. Providing spiritual support to patients, families, and staff during times of illness, crisis, or loss acknowledges the human element and the challenges faced in healthcare. Chaplains play a crucial role in offering emotional and spiritual guidance while respecting diverse religious beliefs and values. They also navigate unique ethical dilemmas inherent to their profession.

Our guests in this episode include:

  • LaVera Crawley, System Vice President for Spiritual Care at CommonSpirit Health.
  • Reverend Donna Allen, Manager of Chaplain Services at a hospital with three campuses in the Bay Area. 
  • Trace Haythorn, Chaplain and former Executive Director and CEO of the Association for Clinical Pastoral Education

Additional resources relating to or referenced in this episode:

Allocating Blood Products: A New Approach to Scarcity

One of the most difficult problems facing hospitals and health systems today is scarcity of key medical resources. Unfortunately, blood product shortages are not uncommon, and they present significant challenges for patient care. Our guests in this episode developed a specific set of recommendations and a protocol for their hospitals to deal with these situations. They’ve also worked to establish a standard approach across their geographic region, which a lot of locations have not really been able to accomplish. We hope their insights and work can inform other ethicists, hospitals and cities looking to develop similar protocols.

Our guests in this episode include

  • Dr. Paul Hutchison, Pulmonary Critical Care Physician and Clinical Ethicist at Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois.
  • Dr. Kathy Neely, Physician and Ethicist at Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago.
  • Leah Eisenberg, Director of Clinical Ethics Consultation Services at UI Health, University of Illinois Chicago system. Also, an Attorney and Visiting Clinical Associate Professor in the Department of Medical Education.

Additional resources relating to or referenced in this episode:

Rural Healthcare: Unique Ethical Perspectives

According to the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, more than 46 million, or 15% of all Americans live in rural areas. And, as more attention is given to meeting the health needs of this population, a significant gap in health between rural and urban Americans has emerged.  

Rural Americans are more likely to die from heart disease, cancer, unintentional injury, chronic respiratory disease, and stroke than their urban counterparts. Unintentional injury deaths are approximately 50 percent higher in rural areas, partly due to greater risk of death from motor vehicle crashes and opioid overdoses. 

These challenges underscore the important role that critical access hospitals play in helping to address these disparities. But what are the ethical considerations that should be looked at when caring for rural communities? In this episode, our guests offer their perspective and expertise on this important topic. 

Our guests in this episode include:

  • Mary Homan, Southwest Division Vice President of Theology and Ethics for CommonSpirit Health.
  • Leslie Kuhnel, Midwest Division Vice President of Theology and Ethics for CommonSpirit Health.
  • Jason Lesandrini, Assistant Vice President, Ethics, Advance Care Planning and Spiritual Health, WellStar Health System.

Additional resources relating to or referenced in this episode:

Beyond Limitations: Disability and Quality of Life

When you hear the phrase quality of life, what comes to mind? Having dinner with family, learning a language, watching a movie with friends? Or, does the image of a patient struggling to perform basic tasks such as bathing or getting dressed, or someone who is reliant on a ventilator to breathe come to mind? Despite its inherently subjective and multifaceted nature, quality of life is a term that is widely used in healthcare, particularly for making critical decisions that have life-altering consequences. It is a complex construct that encompasses a wide range of factors that affect a person’s overall sense of well-being, including their physical health, emotional state, social connections, and financial stability.

In this all new in-depth episode of EthicsLab, with our guests we explore how the concept of quality of life is used in medical decision making and shed light on the challenges this brings, especially to those in the disability community. We offer several solutions to how these challenges can be overcome.

Our guests in this episode include: 

  • Dr. Devan Stahl, bioethicist and Assistant Professor of Religion at Baylor University specializing in clinical ethics and disability ethics.  
  • Melissa Crisp-Cooper (with support from husband Owen Cooper as her revoicer), Health Advocate at UCSF focused on educating clinicians on the needs of people with disabilities and how to interact with them as patients
  • Dr. Clarissa Kripke, Clinical Professor of Family and Community Medicine at UCSF and Director of Office of Developmental Primary Care, a program dedicated to improving outcomes for people with developmental disabilities across the lifespan with an emphasis on adolescents and adults.

Additional resources relating to or referenced in this episode:

  1. Misuses of “Quality of Life” Judgments in End-of-Life Care, Stahl Devan
  2. Clinical Ethics: A Practical Approach to Ethical Decisions in Clinical Medicine, Albert Jonsen, Mark Siegler, William Winslade
  3. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, Tom Beauchamp and James Childress 
  4. Who Defines My Quality of Life?: Perspectives from Disability-Advocates and Caregivers (White Paper) 
  5. Office of Developmental Primary Care 
  6. A survey on self-assessed well-being in a cohort of chronic locked-in syndrome patients: happy majority, miserable minority, Bruno, Marie-Aurélie, et al.
  7. Using quality of life measures in the clinical setting, Higginson, Irene J., and Alison J. Carr
  8. Measuring quality of life: who should measure quality of life, Hall, A. J., and L. Kalra

Assent | End of Life

Assent

End of Life 

In complex cases like this one, it can be helpful for clinicians to provide recommendations. It can be very challenging to provide recommendations at the end of life and warrants, at a minimum, ensuring all clinicians agree. When all clinicians agree a treatment is not medically appropriate or futile, then clinicians should give recommendations using an informed assent/non-dissent format. Informed Assent/non-dissent means a clinician(s) provides medical recommendations in a statement form and the patient or surrogate assents (agrees) or non-dissents (does not disagree) with the recommendations. Informed assent/non-dissent does not require verbal agreement, it requires the patient or surrogate understands the plan and does not disagree.1-3 

  1. Curtis JR, Burt RA. Point: the ethics of unilateral “do not resuscitate” orders: the role of “informed assent”. Chest. Vol 132. United States2007:748-751; discussion 755-746. 
  2. Kon AA. Informed non-dissent: a better option than slow codes when families cannot bear to say; let her die. Am J Bioeth. 2011;11(11):22-2 
  3. Curtis JR, Kross EK, Stapleton RD. The Importance of Addressing Advance Care Planning and Decisions About Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders During Novel Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19). JAMA. Published online March 27, 2020. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.4894